“I thought my lower back would be my Achilles’ heel forever. Foundation training took that thought
out of the equation. I feel strong and flexible, and my posture is better than it has ever been.
This stuff is just plain good for you.”
—Matthew McConaughey, actor “I have always been in great shape and take pride in maintaining a certain level of fitness, but in the time I have been working with Peter Park and Eric Goodman, I have reached a new level of endurance, stamina, and strength. The program pushes me without exhausting me, conditions me, and has completely changed the way my body moves and feels.”
—Derek Fisher, LA Laker and NBA champion
“I am fortunate enough to represent some of the world’s greatest athletes, and after working with
Peter and Eric for the last two years, I am starting to feel as strong as one! The core principles of this book have made me stronger and fitter than I ever imagined possible, and I intend to make them
a part of my daily routine for many years to come.”
—Casey Wasserman, chairman and CEO of Wasserman Media Group
Owner Reviews, Ratings, Comments and Criticism
I have read both "Foundation" and "Eight Steps to a Pain Free Back" in great detail and thought I would give it a try to compare them from my perspective. Let's start with the simple: both books are well written, beautifully illustrated (both on high quality paper) and careful about providing the reader good information. Broadly speaking, the main difference between the two books for me is that Foundation seems more directed (though not exclusively) at athletes, people that are already in pretty darn good shape. I would say that again, in general, the exercise regime recommended Foundation requires a relatively significant level of conditioning. The pictures throughout the book bear that out: everyone looks very buff and no one appears to be much older than 40. OK, make that 30! I think the Gokhale Method is directed toward people that are athletic but also those that are not in great physical shape...old, young, really all ages. You can see that in the pictures in the book...short, tall, heavy, old, babies. I think this because the Gokhale Method involves smaller, more incremental movement that you can do sitting, standing and walking...it's not a set of specific exercises but more a way of moving all the time (though In "8 Steps to a Pain Free Back" there are a set of more rigorous exercises in the back of the book).
The second and perhaps more important difference between the two books lies in their approach to what is the natural and most mechanically advantageous shape of the spine. Foundation assumes the ideal of an "S" shaped curve in the spine and does not address any other ideal. In contrast, the Gokhale Method views the "S" shape as a more recent cultural development that started only in the past 80 years or so (8 Steps provides a historical/anthropological discussion of this cultural shift which I will not go into here...I find it FASCINATING). So prior to the 1920's Esther Gokhale would say that people had more of a "J" shaped spine...one that is relatively without curve until you reach L5-S1. In order to preserve the wedge shape of the L5-S1 curve, the Gokhale Method encourages movement that will, over time, restore the "J" shaped spine. As I understand it, the shape of our spines have not evolved in 90 years...that would not be possible. But our IDEA of what the spine should like as evolved...in unfortunate ways that increase the potential for back pain. If this interests you, get the book...I don't want to go into it any further here.
A view into how an "S" shaped spine versus a "J" shaped spine so dramatically informs movement can be seen in how the two books approach an idea they have in common: the importance of bending at the hip instead of at the back. The photos on pages 64, 86, 102 of the Foundation book (for example) illustrate an approach to bending called "The Founder". Compare these photos to Chapter 7 in 8 Steps to a Pain Free Back. The Foundation book instructs a form of hip-hinging that the Gokhale Method would criticize as encouraging an exaggerated sway in the upper lumbar spine (around L1-L2). The Gokhale Method advises maintaining a straighter, almost plank-like spine when hip-hinging (of course, this depends on each persons flexibility...especially in the hamstrings). Both books encourage an anteverted pelvis (meaning the opposite of a tucked pelvis): The Gokhale Method would caution against over anteverting the pelvis (sticking your bum out too far) to the point of creating a sway in the back because of the resulting disc compression. Finally, if you are still reading this, another significant difference seems that the Gokhale Method focuses a lot of attention on developing all the gluts but in particular, the gluteus medius because so many of us do not develop it sufficiently. As I understand it, when you don't have a well developed glut med, you tend to recruit other muscles inappropriately which, in turn, can exacerbate lower back pain (not a doctor so someone else can weigh in here). 8 Steps devotes an entire chapter to "Glidewalking": a recipe for copying the natural gait found still in many non-industrialized countries where people experience a phenomenally low incidence of back pain compared to the US and more technologically advanced cultures. Foundation focuses on the glutes as an important component of developing core stability and does an good job of identifying the anatomy necessary to engage core muscles...uses easy to understand and simplified, intelligent descriptions.
OK, finally, gotta say I loved the photos in the Foundation with the overlay of muscles...very cool. Also great: the nutritional information included at the end of the book. All in all, I'm more interested in the Gokhale Method because I want to change the way I move entirely, not just have exercises (even if they successfully alleviate back pain...which I have, of course...or I wouldn't have read these books or written this tome!)
So there you have it S vs. J. Gentlepersons, start your engines!
___________________
